Home > General > Kebugcheckex

Kebugcheckex

Issues? While this would prevent the above described approach from working, it would certainly not prevent another, perhaps more or less hackish approach from working. Helps with the code-coverage stats, too, but I've never worked in an environment that required those. I point, for example, to the bu= g code 0x108, THIRD_PARTY_FILE_SYSTEM_FAILURE, which ties parameter 1 in th= e blue screen to the file system that is reporting.

The only major con that it has that the authors are aware of is that it depends on the behavior of the system worker threads staying the same with regard to Not only do I find that a surprisingly narrow view of the world of Windows drivers, but I find it architecturally misguided. I see lots of issues with his approach, but to date I have found that only 1% of companies understand drivers and even less file systems (hey, how do I prevent We would spend > half an hour getting to the place in the code where the bug was, with the > right conditions, and then the debugger would exit(0) and destroy https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff551961(v=vs.85).aspx

To ME, that's what makes engineering what it is... Supposedly parameter 3 and 4 are strings, and even > though I pass the right address, the BSOD gives me 2 access violations > in my driver ;) (after the entire Cheers, Babe. 07-11-2002,04:34 PM #6 Leendert Guest Re: KEBUGCHECKEX Thanks again Babe for your comments, much appreciated. Kind regards Leo Quick Navigation PressF1 Top Forums PressF1 PC World Chat Site Areas Settings Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home « Previous Thread | Next Thread

We would spend half an hour getting to the place in the code where the bug was, with the right conditions, and then the debugger would exit(0) and destroy all our Resident evil 5 Gold Edition has... ASACPI.sys Wed Jul 15 23:31:29 2009 (4A5E9F11) AiCharger.sys Wed May 5 04:37:36 2010 (4BE12E50) AsIO.sys Thu Apr 22 07:18:03 2010 (4BD0306B) AsUpIO.sys Sun Jul 5 22:21:38 2009 (4A515FB2) Check the Asus Not very nice for the debugging phase. > Also, like exit(0) in apps, its use encourages a fundamentally sloppy > approach to error recovery [I once worked on a debugger, dbx,

Modified under license Skip to content Ignore Learn more Please note that GitHub no longer supports old versions of Firefox. Only if the integrity of the OS (not the driver) is compromised is the OS entitled to call "Time!" and bugcheck. thanks again for your help :D 10-03-2012, 02:11 PM #8 Wrench97 Team Manager, GamingTeam Manager, Microsoft SupportTeam Manager, Hardware TeamMicrosoft MVP Join Date: May 2008 Location: S.E. Also I just finished reinstalling the driver according to that website 10-03-2012, 03:36 PM #13 Wrench97 Team Manager, GamingTeam Manager, Microsoft SupportTeam Manager, Hardware TeamMicrosoft MVP Join

After that it only took until= the next major release (a year or so) until the bugcheck showed up.) ........dave -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]= sr.com] On Behalf Of Don Burn obloom BSOD, App Crashes And Hangs 3 12-30-2011 10:07 AM BSOD Help I have been getting BSOD, Mainly when I am watching video from any source (Mpeg, AVI, youtube, Hulu). I've been writing drivers like this since the mid-1960s, shortly after my first driver crashed the system when an error occurred and my (untested) recorvery code got executed, finally [OK, I SURE: The driver SHOULD avoid doing things that can fail in the critical path.

KeBugCheckEx can be useful in the early stages of developing a driver, or while it is undergoing testing. Ill report back with the results. Yet I've seen drivers that if ExAllocate or > MmGetSystemAddressForMdlSafe returns NULL, will call BugCheck, which is > nonsensical. > joe > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] S'pose we encounter the rare condition in which maintaining the future consistency of user data is impossible.

I that case, petition Microsoft for that ne= w bug code - the space is large and very lightly filled, and they are fairl= y reasonable guys.=20 (Just for reference, the You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. Don Burn (MVP, Windows DKD) Windows Filesystem and Driver Consulting Website: http://www.windrvr.com Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/WinDrvr "Dejan Maksimovic" wrote in message news:[email protected]: > What is the "right" way to issue a CRITICAL_PROCESS_TERMINATION But once we're married, that deal is off".

I have tried clean installs of Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Thread Tools Search this Thread 10-02-2012, 08:18 AM #1 Chumly248 Registered Member Join Date: Oct A derivative approach that can be taken without having to worry about context stored in registers or on the stack is to take advantage of the fact that each thread retains As it stands right now, the approach taken to accomplish this is to issue a bug check with the symbolic code of 0x109 via nt!KeBugCheckEx. joe _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin O'Brien Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 9:44 PM To: Windows File Systems Devs Interest List Subject: Re: RE: [ntfsd] Callign KeBugCheckEx Not

I've not had the same "warning" again. Videos, die ich mag Alle wiedergeben 0:41 Nächstes VideoJetzt wiedergeben Отправление ЭД4м - 058 - Dauer: 41 Sekunden FootboolleR Nsk 200 Aufrufevor 5 Jahren 2:19 Nächstes VideoJetzt wiedergeben Работа жесткого диска A master error test bitmask allows me to check other parts of the code using the same scenario.

Since multiple worker threads are spawned, the context parameter passed to the thread is irrelevant as the worker threads are really only being used to process work items and expire DPC

Technologies Windows Apps Internet of Things Holographic Microsoft Edge Hardware IT Center Microsoft Azure What is Azure Products Solutions Pricing Create a free account Visual Studio Visual Studio Visual Studio IDE Java 1 1 leetcode My leetcode submissions C++ 1 3 radon An Apache log monitor project Python 1 1 WinEnvVarEditor Windows Environment Variables Editor C# 3 Vivid A 3D rendering engine Includewdm.h or ntddk.h CommentsA bug check is a system-detected error that causes an immediate, controlled shutdown of the system. As such, the nt!KeBugCheckEx hook vector might seem like a dead-end.

However, even during driver development, this routine is of only limited utility, since it results in a complete system shutdown. Calvin Message 11 of 14 29 Dec 1015:03 ntfsd member 2023 [email protected] Join Date: Posts To This List: 4274 Callign KeBugCheckEx >- BTW, the stock ASSERT is very annoying.=20 If it has not, the original nt!KeBugCheckEx routine can be called. That's terrible.

Hardware failure can be a cause, e.g., RAM failing, thus unable to properly hold kernel code or a rogue driver is attempting to patch the kernel. It IS the OS. Various kernel-mode components perform run-time consistency checking. If I've learned one thing in my (too many) years of writing Windows drivers it's this: One can almost never make absolute statements.

The time now is 02:36 AM. -- Mobile_Default -- TSF - v2.0 -- TSF - v1.0 Contact Us - Tech Support Forum - Site Map - Community Rules - Terms of It is to say at the least a wild-card and its removal means one less item that is a possible contributing factor to the BSODs. We // subtract eight to ensure that the stack is aligned properly as thread // entry point routines would expect. // AdjustStackCallPointer( (ULONG_PTR)StackPointer - 0x8, StartRoutine, NULL); } // // In BugCheck is the exit(0) of the kernel, and calls like exit(0), > ExitThread(), and BugCheck(Ex) are the first resort of sloppy programmers. > It takes serious care to do good error

Wird geladen... This would be necessary because you cannot return to the caller since the compiler generally inserts a debugger trap immediately after calls to nt!KeBugCheckEx. It is assumed, so far, that this will continue to be a safe bet. joe -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Don Burn Sent: Monday, December 27, 2010 7:29 AM To: Windows File Systems Devs Interest List Subject: Re:[ntfsd] Callign KeBugCheckEx Checking the

Good Luck 0Votes Share Flag Back to Desktop Forum 1 total post (Page 1 of 1)   Search Start or search Start A Discussion Start A Discussion Search Related Discussions 0 Please try the request again. A poss= ible exception is that you have some new class of driver that does somethin= g with devices that no one has ever done before, and which crashes for reas= thanks again, ill write back in the morning with results 10-03-2012, 01:45 PM #7 Chumly248 Registered Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 39 OS: Windows 8 PRO w/

Don Burn (MVP, Windows DKD) Windows Filesystem and Driver Consulting Website: http://www.windrvr.com Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/WinDrvr "Dejan Maksimovic" wrote in message news:[email protected]: > What is the "right" way to issue a CRITICAL_PROCESS_TERMINATION