Home > Why Is > Java Sucks

Java Sucks


That doesn't make my argument invalid. Nope! Most will live with it until it catches up. I must've understood something wrong." After having writing 10's of thousands of lines of production-quality Java, I think I qualify as an expert, regardless.

In terms of tools / frameworks deploy tools frequently used by Sysadmins are often Ruby, and it also has a couple of excellent web frameworks (Rails and Sinatra) Funnily enough, going Reply Matthias says: February 25, 2014 at 5:54 PM > A Java application doing the same thing will most likely > have several layers of inheritance, object factories, … Inheritance is GEmersonBiggins says: March 17, 2014 at 5:47 PM MS doesn't even bundle a text editor with line numbers, even when you buy the workstation or enterprise version of Windoze. Again, this concept isn't new, people in the Lisp/Scheme world have been doing it for a very long time, it's just that they never got the exposure that Chrome did.

Why Is Java Bad For My Computer

It means I have to write it, have to maintain it, have to read through it when looking for a bug.Consider how many java haters actually like C#. Need to make a config change? It's not like "Ok, this is RTM - we have tested it and most critical bugs have been taken out". - It's a big huge warning sign saying "DO NOT use

There is little or no reason for a function to be a method if it can't access private fields. (Fixed in ES6 via symbols) JavaScript doesn't support hashes or dictionaries. I will add that the eclipse scala ide is pretty good, but not as performant as the java one. First I learned to program in c well. Why Is Javascript Bad Either way, this actually is funny, just not in the way Obie intended.

PHP. Why Java Is Bad Something tells me that I'll be doing Java for a long time to come though, as that's where the market need and salaries are. Posted by Java Developer on September 20, 2007 at 02:59 PM EDT # Loved your post. https://www.reddit.com/r/learnprogramming/comments/35nay8/why_do_people_say_that_java_sucks/ Java is good for low memory applications, it has its place but its not good for anything meant to be high quality in my opinion.

Sure, but if you need to use MSVC older than 2015 (very likely at some dev houses), you're screwed. Java Security Issues Using Objective-C portably is an oxymoron; GNUStep is a window manager for the fringe on Linux, and there's nothing really there for Windows at all... Tom Dane says: March 17, 2014 at 8:34 PM You talk out your ass now "I found a stackoverflow post talking about double buffering. Reply HighCore says: March 17, 2014 at 5:59 PM "adoption" - sorry.

Why Java Is Bad

The bottom line is this. https://wiki.theory.org/YourLanguageSucks permalinkembedsaveparentgive gold[–]dacian88 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago(10 children)i think you're missing the point of an object oriented programming language, most pure OO languages don't have globals. Why Is Java Bad For My Computer About the Java name, and associated politics: The fact is that there are four completely different things that go by the name ``Java'': A language; An enormous class library; A virtual Disadvantages Of Java Programming Language Java byte code is essentially the jvm's instruction set, exactly like Asm for a CPU.

a minimal, runnable example. You were also safe if they said they wanted C++ or Java developers. Worse than merely being lame, they brag about how lame it is! Everything they say or do is OK with you. Java Criticism

This is also the reason why Jython, Scala, and Clojure are rapidly becoming popular. Oh, that's right-- it's for WEB development. A lot of experienced programmers end up working on code written by beginners. Asking Questions - Offering Help Please read our Frequently Asked Questions section before posting.

Library: It comes with hash tables, but not qsort? Why Python Is Bad String has length+24 bytes of overhead over byte[]: class String implements java.io.Serializable { private char value[]; // 4 bytes + 12 bytes of array header private int offset; // 4 bytes A lot of beginners boggle cluelessly at the code written by experienced but perhaps not yet wise programmers.

You might think it'd give 'em pause to think and realize that other people might also want to have public read-only yet privately writable variables, but no.

Foo f = new Foo(); Baz b = new Boo(); f.bar(b) ... Java was already stable, mature, safe, hardware accelerated, and pushed to blistering speeds, LONG before .Net or C# were (viable) options. I would say about 30% of the Java code I write is error checking code and code to handle exceptions because Java really sucks at this. Java Bag You made a lot of claims on this thread that were proven false.

You can't iterate over varargs. That doesn't make it less useless in the present world in 2014. Lucky you are not a professional joker, dood! But now I forgot what I was going to say.

Could randomly crash if you return SEL from method [4] Awful type system. And they are not related with the developer´s opinion on what is cool. Nearly everything is wrapped with objects and many things must be buffered, even those things that don't really need to be objects or be buffered. (examples?) Some interfaces such as Serializable Their hubris was their downfall.

When talking to other classmates, they say that have moved on to C# and things of that nature.